<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rogues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tapeandstring.com/2009/11/12/rogues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tapeandstring.com/2009/11/12/rogues/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:31:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://blog.tapeandstring.com/2009/11/12/rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tapeandstring.com/?p=753#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Thx for the comment—it&#039;s an interesting point you bring up. I&#039;m glad this brief post resonated w/ you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx for the comment—it&#8217;s an interesting point you bring up. I&#8217;m glad this brief post resonated w/ you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Austin</title>
		<link>http://blog.tapeandstring.com/2009/11/12/rogues/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tapeandstring.com/?p=753#comment-370</guid>
		<description>When I had my own business and I was doing work for Amgen and WaMu, when confronted with price issues or if I knew I was going to be the highest bid... I would tell the potential client to go to W3C and use their &quot;HTML Validator&quot; to check my competitions URLs for errors and to do the same for my sites. (It was self defense, okay.)

The client would would freak out if they were not tech oriented after seeing error after error and I would play the &quot;my code is W3C compliant and guaranteed to always work card&quot; and your job will be safe withme, but will it be safe with them?

That is the only thing these &quot;rogues&quot; or &quot;wankers&quot; can&#039;t compete with on a demonstrable level is Being so thorough that a mystic organization called W3C likes your code better. The client feels safe and it worked for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I had my own business and I was doing work for Amgen and WaMu, when confronted with price issues or if I knew I was going to be the highest bid&#8230; I would tell the potential client to go to W3C and use their &#8220;HTML Validator&#8221; to check my competitions URLs for errors and to do the same for my sites. (It was self defense, okay.)</p>
<p>The client would would freak out if they were not tech oriented after seeing error after error and I would play the &#8220;my code is W3C compliant and guaranteed to always work card&#8221; and your job will be safe withme, but will it be safe with them?</p>
<p>That is the only thing these &#8220;rogues&#8221; or &#8220;wankers&#8221; can&#8217;t compete with on a demonstrable level is Being so thorough that a mystic organization called W3C likes your code better. The client feels safe and it worked for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
